Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755387Ab3F1Kl2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 06:41:28 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([94.23.35.102]:59303 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754931Ab3F1Kl1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 06:41:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:41:25 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Hans de Goede Cc: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Emilio Lopez , kevin@allwinnertech.com, sunny@allwinnertech.com, shuge@allwinnertech.com Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/8] clocksource: sunxi: Timer fixes and cleanup Message-ID: <20130628104125.GG4319@lukather> References: <1372281421-2099-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <51CC0566.8010302@redhat.com> <20130627094307.GC8437@lukather> <51CC0BC3.5090309@redhat.com> <20130627165436.GB4319@lukather> <51CC80E4.8060801@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kjpMrWxdCilgNbo1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51CC80E4.8060801@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2220 Lines: 62 --kjpMrWxdCilgNbo1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Hans, On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:13:56PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >Siarhei however notes that even higher-end SoCs like the exynos5 have > >similar performances with that regard. So I'm not sure we can do > >something about it, except what is suggested in the above mail, which > >looks rather unsafe. > > > >Anyway, like you said, we have no easy other solution, and we lacked > >such support until now. > > > >So why not merge this code for now, and try to optimise it later if we > >find it's needed. >=20 > That is fine with me, I just wanted to share that this has shown as > a bottleneck in some benchmarks in case anyone has a clever idea to > fix it ... And you were right, since I wasn't aware of such discussion. Thanks! Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --kjpMrWxdCilgNbo1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRzWhUAAoJEBx+YmzsjxAgpY8QAIHrB0oY7gtAJ0Y3k9XU9qeN gilSHsJZlH7iZ2gQ0Gpilk8kQnoVf/hAk5s/b+jYJimAqw9YUOgCF+e/SfVnFE6S jDwxnQuwxOwwWyCWAFyJQZIUzo9PerM2EZf6dI1f7gy08IerB0c+UDvdoFVBXFFr 823zNFVtoZxGzgzO6E953uQvA35O0mSst7s0vSQ+WTypkqsL39rULWsjFp9SPPDh VTDSIXRTPshjkd5ISXos/P3b+CKt974S/O/ZORjTg7/u8dapshIVaWB6espNWy4X 39TWKpDnKTqqaVhtE/VQ2U4nEjh+oeuYtE/liBFy0Y/POdVtxc3UNE8m0bL8X/AY nXYTtDqU7ZkC4WdZ6paiKE8tkqs/WqRm6L8Iifzp4klIonJeZE4COYlJ/GUotfwo Xw87CtBgNG+ubycYRyo+KkByDRNgmgaTYdaIEjd2pLuw112ZnPdfXPUZvzsqI6Xc hXirMzw65qCgvWxX9a2Edn3Ecam938BaReze5zDkFzx5k7xpkFIIWn50RoBkgyg7 l4oHXKbPkDW9qimYKcxeToEjzXTVw77iqdTGzwjl3j3IeWLCb9jP7xCkpirKTMp0 uW2ft2CnOjQ5EhUgANjiiuWOI6TFKaf8AfARN5YEX6m9828EmIAYg46Ktakzc94H YSCg6WLPlgBtFLv1LRPD =Yfgf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kjpMrWxdCilgNbo1-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/