Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755593Ab3F1QEo (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:04:44 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:46503 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751230Ab3F1QEm (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:04:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1372435479.29380.11.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] lib: vsprintf: add IPv4/v6 generic %p[Ii]S[pfs] format specifier From: Joe Perches To: Daniel Borkmann Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:04:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <51CDB183.1070209@redhat.com> References: <1372421131-1672-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <1372421131-1672-2-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <1372434289.29380.6.camel@joe-AO722> <51CDB183.1070209@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1674 Lines: 45 On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:53 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 06/28/2013 05:44 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 14:05 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > >> In order to avoid making code that deals with printing both, IPv4 and > >> IPv6 addresses, unnecessary complicated as for example ... [] > > Should any other include other than net/addrconf be needed? > I'm not sure I understand this question. the #include indirectly includes and but because this now uses struct sockaddr and family it may be more sensible to directly include those. No worries really, it works now. > >> +char *ip6_addr_string_sa(char *buf, char *end, const struct sockaddr_in6 *sa, > >> + struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt) > >> +{ > > [] > >> + char fmt6[2] = { fmt[0], '6'}; > > > > This looks odd to me. why not use a bool compressed > > flag and identify this before the isalpha loop and not > > have fmt6 at all? > > Well, we have a bool called 'have_c' that identifies if 'c' was specified. To have > the same behaviour as with %pI6, this is used to create a temporary fmt that we then > can pass to ip6_string(). If you look at ip6_addr_string(), it's done the same way, It's a little different than that. > and by that, we stay compatible in behaviour. That's slightly tricky, ip6_addr_string just needs "I" or "i" But, your implementation, your choice, cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/