Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752517Ab3F1SyN (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:54:13 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:41625 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752725Ab3F1SyK (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:54:10 -0400 From: Kamal Mostafa To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: Paul Moore , "David S. Miller" , Kamal Mostafa Subject: [PATCH 069/105] netlabel: improve domain mapping validation Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:51:31 -0700 Message-Id: <1372445527-24414-70-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 In-Reply-To: <1372445527-24414-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> References: <1372445527-24414-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3780 Lines: 125 3.8.13.4 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Paul Moore [ Upstream commit 6b21e1b77d1a3d58ebfd513264c885695e8a0ba5 ] The net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c:netlbl_domhsh_add() function does not properly validate new domain hash entries resulting in potential problems when an administrator attempts to add an invalid entry. One such problem, as reported by Vlad Halilov, is a kernel BUG (found in netlabel_domainhash.c:netlbl_domhsh_audit_add()) when adding an IPv6 outbound mapping with a CIPSO configuration. This patch corrects this problem by adding the necessary validation code to netlbl_domhsh_add() via the newly created netlbl_domhsh_validate() function. Ideally this patch should also be pushed to the currently active -stable trees. Reported-by: Vlad Halilov Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa --- net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c index d8d4243..6bb1d42 100644 --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c @@ -245,6 +245,71 @@ static void netlbl_domhsh_audit_add(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, } } +/** + * netlbl_domhsh_validate - Validate a new domain mapping entry + * @entry: the entry to validate + * + * This function validates the new domain mapping entry to ensure that it is + * a valid entry. Returns zero on success, negative values on failure. + * + */ +static int netlbl_domhsh_validate(const struct netlbl_dom_map *entry) +{ + struct netlbl_af4list *iter4; + struct netlbl_domaddr4_map *map4; +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) + struct netlbl_af6list *iter6; + struct netlbl_domaddr6_map *map6; +#endif /* IPv6 */ + + if (entry == NULL) + return -EINVAL; + + switch (entry->type) { + case NETLBL_NLTYPE_UNLABELED: + if (entry->type_def.cipsov4 != NULL || + entry->type_def.addrsel != NULL) + return -EINVAL; + break; + case NETLBL_NLTYPE_CIPSOV4: + if (entry->type_def.cipsov4 == NULL) + return -EINVAL; + break; + case NETLBL_NLTYPE_ADDRSELECT: + netlbl_af4list_foreach(iter4, &entry->type_def.addrsel->list4) { + map4 = netlbl_domhsh_addr4_entry(iter4); + switch (map4->type) { + case NETLBL_NLTYPE_UNLABELED: + if (map4->type_def.cipsov4 != NULL) + return -EINVAL; + break; + case NETLBL_NLTYPE_CIPSOV4: + if (map4->type_def.cipsov4 == NULL) + return -EINVAL; + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + } +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) + netlbl_af6list_foreach(iter6, &entry->type_def.addrsel->list6) { + map6 = netlbl_domhsh_addr6_entry(iter6); + switch (map6->type) { + case NETLBL_NLTYPE_UNLABELED: + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + } +#endif /* IPv6 */ + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + + return 0; +} + /* * Domain Hash Table Functions */ @@ -311,6 +376,10 @@ int netlbl_domhsh_add(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, struct netlbl_af6list *tmp6; #endif /* IPv6 */ + ret_val = netlbl_domhsh_validate(entry); + if (ret_val != 0) + return ret_val; + /* XXX - we can remove this RCU read lock as the spinlock protects the * entire function, but before we do we need to fixup the * netlbl_af[4,6]list RCU functions to do "the right thing" with -- 1.8.1.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/