Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753257Ab3F1UDf (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:03:35 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([94.23.35.102]:33797 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752611Ab3F1UDe (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:03:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 22:03:33 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Emilio Lopez Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: sunxi: Convert DTSI to new CPU bindings Message-ID: <20130628200333.GA2756@lukather> References: <1372437844-16325-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20130628171532.GD30603@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130628171532.GD30603@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2492 Lines: 70 --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:44:02PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Arnd, Olof, > >=20 > > Sorry for steping in so late, but these two patches fixes a warning > > introduced by the commit 1ba9bf0a (ARM: 7762/1: kernel: fix > > arm_dt_init_cpu_maps() to skip non-cpu nodes) after 3.10-rc7. > >=20 > > These two patches solve the situation for sunxi. The first one by > > Lorenzo is to be applied for 3.10 if it's still possible, and the > > second one on top of arm-soc/for-next. Tell me if you prefer a more > > formal pull request for these patches > >=20 > > Thanks! > > Maxime > >=20 > > Lorenzo Pieralisi (1): > > ARM: dts: sunxi: cpus/cpu nodes dts updates >=20 > The patch above should already be queued in next/dt right ? Indeed. Then why the latest patch of your patchset got in 3.10, while the patches actually fixing the DT it would have impacted were delayed to 3.11? (And why was it merged so late in the development cycle?) Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRzewVAAoJEBx+YmzsjxAgWmMP+gIbmPZRR7vL/9CfNeNYsgnG NYgsTWM23ATJDa/RDj/vrtODHVvrs2SwxWByHvzEJLQkV/MnKDNKbDTKe3lxNnP5 emSCpbmJ1Jpw4pDl0goA49zMT2684jrdMNv8m7KxBJ16JR1SWuOSvSd4/hY8r+fG 16gKKSG/nLOTLJsYX2/dcZUxpSMJFq1ES33zO37qN5DVK2ZbMm0ZTvCDOW5uezEr iHWsAVbo0p/CCE37jyebY5RfVm7cbrdujpWh5xfPgRqNdWcK2TBAxzBE1sPt4n8s aiyQVAcWUh+0rDIosg7lXmXcUWUSjQN+AbLkdAspBYHQmjh8gDjTyMVusHuKcWjv yTwp0E449BknDdbyo/3pGefhhmyrdPEerKO9rVNujXYolfqXdd7hfoV0DmRkhntF 4UAppPgR1Pk6KvVvlooG3mrVYF5CDUzzt+rP8UUzBTw+csonRfk80XzO0XLP2gvb rr1bcSNUte3qQD/5ZuUIuqws5N2qkM/IsOc65uSRIDMBn0JfuHg9PAGBnLiRqKzx 7EA6B4lA+W7dJBmU818puza1loIkvp4MFQEtqvg1I4HMy7rUo9N40E/a6EOF/EyG jjkgPpeubWfu3QLKGiPEfNXFazTv9hSwgMC1ZdoJcE3hylFOMn/G7JuRBHr9Zfez N2eI0un/YE6uX2UgD7+0 =CCQP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/