Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753557Ab3F1UMf (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:12:35 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]:34203 "EHLO mail-qc0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752608Ab3F1UMe (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:12:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [2620:0:1000:1b02:6e3b:e5ff:fe16:f1aa] In-Reply-To: <20130628200333.GA2756@lukather> References: <1372437844-16325-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20130628171532.GD30603@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20130628200333.GA2756@lukather> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:05:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: sunxi: Convert DTSI to new CPU bindings From: Olof Johansson To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Emilio Lopez , Russell King - ARM Linux Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1587 Lines: 44 On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:44:02PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> > Hi Arnd, Olof, >> > >> > Sorry for steping in so late, but these two patches fixes a warning >> > introduced by the commit 1ba9bf0a (ARM: 7762/1: kernel: fix >> > arm_dt_init_cpu_maps() to skip non-cpu nodes) after 3.10-rc7. >> > >> > These two patches solve the situation for sunxi. The first one by >> > Lorenzo is to be applied for 3.10 if it's still possible, and the >> > second one on top of arm-soc/for-next. Tell me if you prefer a more >> > formal pull request for these patches >> > >> > Thanks! >> > Maxime >> > >> > Lorenzo Pieralisi (1): >> > ARM: dts: sunxi: cpus/cpu nodes dts updates >> >> The patch above should already be queued in next/dt right ? > > Indeed. > > Then why the latest patch of your patchset got in 3.10, while the > patches actually fixing the DT it would have impacted were delayed to > 3.11? > > (And why was it merged so late in the development cycle?) This. So now we have to scramble because some device trees will produce warnings at boot. Russell, the alternative is to revert Lorenzo's patch for 3.10 (and re-introduce it for 3.11). Do you have a preference? -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/