Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752880Ab3F2TjG (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2013 15:39:06 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:35071 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751115Ab3F2TjD (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jun 2013 15:39:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 20:38:19 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Olof Johansson Cc: Maxime Ripard , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Emilio Lopez Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: sunxi: Convert DTSI to new CPU bindings Message-ID: <20130629193819.GD3353@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1372437844-16325-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20130628171532.GD30603@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20130628200333.GA2756@lukather> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1310 Lines: 32 On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >> The patch above should already be queued in next/dt right ? > > > > Indeed. > > > > Then why the latest patch of your patchset got in 3.10, while the > > patches actually fixing the DT it would have impacted were delayed to > > 3.11? > > > > (And why was it merged so late in the development cycle?) > > This. So now we have to scramble because some device trees will > produce warnings at boot. > > Russell, the alternative is to revert Lorenzo's patch for 3.10 (and > re-introduce it for 3.11). Do you have a preference? Sorry but I really don't understand what all the fuss in this thread is about. This thread seems to be saying that two development patches were merged, which were 7762/1 and 7763/1, and that 7764/1 is a fix? Are you sure about that, because that's not how they're described, and not how they look either. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/