Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752005Ab3F3Js6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jun 2013 05:48:58 -0400 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:55931 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750757Ab3F3Jsz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jun 2013 05:48:55 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:48:46 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Olof Johansson , Maxime Ripard , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Emilio Lopez Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: sunxi: Convert DTSI to new CPU bindings Message-ID: <20130630094846.GA27559@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1372437844-16325-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20130628171532.GD30603@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20130628200333.GA2756@lukather> <20130629193819.GD3353@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130629193819.GD3353@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2013 09:48:50.0603 (UTC) FILETIME=[06352FB0:01CE7577] X-MC-Unique: 113063010485301101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1804 Lines: 43 On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:38:19PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Maxime Ripard > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > >> The patch above should already be queued in next/dt right ? > > > > > > Indeed. > > > > > > Then why the latest patch of your patchset got in 3.10, while the > > > patches actually fixing the DT it would have impacted were delayed to > > > 3.11? > > > > > > (And why was it merged so late in the development cycle?) > > > > This. So now we have to scramble because some device trees will > > produce warnings at boot. > > > > Russell, the alternative is to revert Lorenzo's patch for 3.10 (and > > re-introduce it for 3.11). Do you have a preference? > > Sorry but I really don't understand what all the fuss in this thread > is about. > > This thread seems to be saying that two development patches were > merged, which were 7762/1 and 7763/1, and that 7764/1 is a fix? > Are you sure about that, because that's not how they're described, > and not how they look either. As Olof's warning downgrade is being merged (thanks for that and apologies for failing to explain patches dependencies properly and stable related issues), 7764/1 won't apply cleanly anymore. Can you please drop it from the patch system, I will update it and test it first thing tomorrow and send a final version to the patch system. Thank you very much, Lorenzo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/