Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263086AbSJGPYj>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:24:39 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263087AbSJGPYj>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:24:39 -0400
Received: from h66-38-216-165.gtconnect.net ([66.38.216.165]:8466 "HELO
	innerfire.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S263086AbSJGPYi>;
	Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:24:38 -0400
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:30:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Gerhard Mack <gmack@innerfire.net>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: best version for server?
In-Reply-To: <20021007080132.A13486@work.bitmover.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210071129540.20621-100000@innerfire.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 863
Lines: 25

On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Larry McVoy wrote:

> We're not sure if it is something we've done or just increased usage, but
> bkbits.net is getting hammered lately.  We see load averages in ~15-20
> range pretty regularly.  It's got some nasty characteristics from the
> point of view of server/VM system, tons of data and not really any good
> working sets.  I'm running 2.4.5 on it and that clearly has to go.  I am
> going to try the rmap kernel but I'm open to other suggestions.

I think your being slashdotted..

	Gerhard

--
Gerhard Mack

gmack@innerfire.net

<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/