Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:11:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:11:50 -0400 Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:15122 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:11:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:17:26 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bcopy() Message-ID: <20021007191726.A23246@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Mike Galbraith , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <5.1.0.14.2.20021007195409.00b54a98@pop.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:08:19AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 672 Lines: 15 On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:08:19AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So I'd much rather see the XFS etc code moved away from bcopy() first, > because that's the _real_ cleanup. The library code isn't all that ugly in > comparison. The lowlevel XFS code tries to stay in sync as much as possible with the IRIX codebase to make maintaince easier (we're a very small team..). It could be removed, but I don't think it would help.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/