Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:49:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:49:59 -0400 Received: from smtpout.mac.com ([204.179.120.86]:4546 "EHLO smtpout.mac.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:49:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:56:00 -0500 Subject: Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v546) Cc: Ben Collins , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek From: tom_gall@mac.com In-Reply-To: <20021007001137.A6352@elf.ucw.cz> Message-Id: <6BB2BEDE-DA26-11D6-990A-0003939E069A@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.546) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2133 Lines: 50 On Sunday, October 6, 2002, at 05:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> We're a business. We're a business which happens to be committed to >> helping the kernel team because we think that the kernel is vital to >> the world at large. Helping the kernel absolutely does not translate >> to helping people who happen to be our competitors. By your own > > Stop lying. Your job is to make lots of money and you are using Linux > as cheap advertising. You are trying to make people pay *you* to do > kernel development (as it stands you want $5000 for any bk-using > developer inside RedHat and SuSE). O Please! As the person that started this thread this is way way way way out there and quite frankly I find offensive. I do NOT honestly think that Larry made the change to the license that he did for the express purpose of milking some set of companies out of $$$$. That's just dumb. Like Larry and others who have made some rather good points over the couple of days, I think we're all trying to find a way to reasonably solve this that is is everyone's best interesting, including Larry's company. Granted it's a different kind of license, (IE Microsoft doesn't have a clause in IE that says Netscape developers can't use IE) but hey, it's Larry's company and he's perfectly in his rights to do so. It is truely a good thing that Larry is allowing some set of us in the open source community to use his product without costs. Personally I'm willing to pay a reasonable license fee for it but it's gotta be something that I can afford without getting my head torn off by my wife. Of course the other solution is to adjust the license a bit so folks like me who are just doing kernel work and not in competition with Larry's company (no matter what others in my company are doing) can use it. That's what I hope for... maybe it'll come true. Regards, Tom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/