Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:38:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:38:37 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.18.111]:6666 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:38:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 22:44:14 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: tom_gall@mac.com Cc: Pavel Machek , Ben Collins , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?] Message-ID: <20021007204414.GD7428@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20021007001137.A6352@elf.ucw.cz> <6BB2BEDE-DA26-11D6-990A-0003939E069A@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6BB2BEDE-DA26-11D6-990A-0003939E069A@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1836 Lines: 45 Hi! > >>We're a business. We're a business which happens to be committed to > >>helping the kernel team because we think that the kernel is vital to > >>the world at large. Helping the kernel absolutely does not translate > >>to helping people who happen to be our competitors. By your own > > > >Stop lying. Your job is to make lots of money and you are using Linux > >as cheap advertising. You are trying to make people pay *you* to do > >kernel development (as it stands you want $5000 for any bk-using > >developer inside RedHat and SuSE). > > O Please! As the person that started this thread this is way way way > way out there and quite frankly I find offensive. > > I do NOT honestly think that Larry made the change to the license that > he did for the express purpose of milking some set of companies out of > $$$$. That's just dumb. Maybe it is doing for purpose of slowing down subversion/CVS/arch development. Thats about as bad. > Granted it's a different kind of license, (IE Microsoft doesn't have a > clause in IE that says Netscape developers can't use IE) but hey, it's > Larry's company and he's perfectly in his rights to do so. It is > truely a good thing that Larry is allowing some set of us in the open > source community to use his product without costs. Good thing for who? Good thing for Larry? I don't know. Good thing for us? I don't think so. Good thing for subversion developers? Definitely not. Pavel -- Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building, cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/