Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:02:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:02:00 -0400 Received: from dhcp101-dsl-usw4.w-link.net ([208.161.125.101]:21682 "EHLO grok.yi.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:00:56 -0400 Message-ID: <3DA1E923.7050707@candelatech.com> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 13:05:55 -0700 From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King CC: george anzinger , Nicolas Pitre , Mark Mielke , "David S. Miller" , simon@baydel.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, lkml Subject: Re: The end of embedded Linux? References: <3DA1D87E.81A1351C@mvista.com> <20021007201111.C5381@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1015 Lines: 28 Russell King wrote: > Now imagine the case when you have 100 different machine types, all > different, using this device where each hardware designer has decided to > connect the chip up differently. > > Is putting this crud into drivers going to be maintainable? No. I'm not sure which is worse: A driver that is hard to maintain, or one that is completely broken on some architectures, even though numerous people keep re-inventing the fix. Personally, I'd rather have a hacked up driver that works, but I'm sure others have other opinions! Ben -- Ben Greear President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/