Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:52:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:51:55 -0400 Received: from 2-225.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.160.225]:20432 "EHLO 2-225.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:50:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:55:45 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Pavel Machek cc: tom_gall@mac.com, Pavel Machek , Ben Collins , Larry McVoy , Subject: Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?] In-Reply-To: <20021007204414.GD7428@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 977 Lines: 28 On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Pavel Machek wrote: > Maybe it is doing for purpose of slowing down subversion/CVS/arch > development. Thats about as bad. You sound about as pissed off as you do in a random thread about somebody who violates the GPL, only now you're on the other side of the fence. If you don't like the new bitkeeper license, don't use bitkeeper. If you feel _really_ strongly about it, help the subversion people to build something as good as, or better than, bitkeeper so you can convince kernel hackers to switch. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/