Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:31:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:31:13 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:23681 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:31:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:36:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: Pavel Machek cc: tom_gall@mac.com, Pavel Machek , Ben Collins , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?] In-Reply-To: <20021007204414.GD7428@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1065 Lines: 28 On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Pavel Machek wrote: > Good thing for who? > > Good thing for Larry? I don't know. > > Good thing for us? I don't think so. > > Good thing for subversion developers? Definitely not. Damn you. That thread got me to download subversion source and read it - mistake I won't repeat any time soon. I've spent several months wading through fairly disgusting code - block device drivers are not pretty, ditto for devfs. I had more than once found myself grabbing Lovecraft to read something that would be less nightmare-inducing. But _THAT_ takes the fscking cake - I don't _care_ what Larry (or anybody else for that matter) does to people who had excreted that code. No, wait - I _do_ care. I want video of the... event. I don't use BK, but you can be damn sure that I won't touch SVN. Ever. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/