Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933777Ab3GEMzl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 5 Jul 2013 08:55:41 -0400
Received: from mail-ve0-f182.google.com ([209.85.128.182]:54220 "EHLO
	mail-ve0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932890Ab3GEMzk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 5 Jul 2013 08:55:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201307051441.27605.heiko@sntech.de>
References: <201307051440.19428.heiko@sntech.de>
	<201307051441.27605.heiko@sntech.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 09:55:40 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5AHX0UpeKQh+faPT=MfCf53eo=kXigtOZd7iuKrz-sFeA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] misc: sram: add ability to mark sram sections as reserved
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
        Ulrich Prinz <ulrich.prinz@googlemail.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1873
Lines: 48

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> Some SoCs need parts of their sram for special purposes. So while being part
> of the periphal, it should not be part of the genpool controlling the sram.
>
> Threfore add an option mmio-sram-reserved to keep arbitary portions of the
> sram from being part of the pool.
>
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Tested-by: Ulrich Prinz <ulrich.prinz@googlemail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt |    8 +++
>  drivers/misc/sram.c                             |   80 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt
> index 4d0a00e..eae080e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt
> @@ -8,9 +8,17 @@ Required properties:
>
>  - reg : SRAM iomem address range
>
> +Optional properties:
> +
> +- mmio-sram-reserved: ordered list of reserved chunks inside the sram that
> +  should not become part of the genalloc pool.
> +  Format is <base size>, <base size>, ...; with base being relative to the
> +  reg property base.

Isn't it a typo?

I think you meant:
Format is <base start>, <reserved size>,

> +
>  Example:
>
>  sram: sram@5c000000 {
>         compatible = "mmio-sram";
>         reg = <0x5c000000 0x40000>; /* 256 KiB SRAM at address 0x5c000000 */
> +       mmio-sram-reserved = <0x0 0x100>; /* reserve 0x5c000000-0x5c000100 */
>  };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/