Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 22:11:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 22:11:43 -0500 Received: from hybrid-024-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.152.185]:36335 "EHLO opus.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 22:11:35 -0500 Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 19:40:31 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4test-ac merge status Message-ID: <20001230194031.C4703@opus.bloom.county> In-Reply-To: <20001230192737.B4703@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:33:50AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:33:50AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > I'm sure at least a few people want to know where the PowerPC port falls in > > all of that. :) > > > > ...hopeing we aren't in the bitbucket.. > > It might be the ppc port is 2.4.0ac1 and 2.4.2 Linus or something. I don't think > that is likely to be a big problem. I need to get on top of 2.2.19pre4 and > the rest of the Linus resync then I'm going to dump chunks of stuff out of > -ac and try and get a nice clean -ac tree. If folks want to sync non x86 > ports with that initially go ahead. Oh well. I guess our problem is we can never get Linus to notice the smaller chunks and he always seems to hate big patches. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/