Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:45:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:45:41 -0400 Received: from fusion.wineasy.se ([195.42.198.105]:56837 "HELO fusion.wineasy.se") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:45:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 00:51:16 +0200 From: Andreas Schuldei Cc: Keith Owens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kdb against memory corruption? Message-ID: <20021007225116.GF1102@lukas> References: <20021006200801.GD1316@lukas> <10888.1033981406@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> <20021007171140.GD1102@lukas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021007171140.GD1102@lukas> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 713 Lines: 15 * Andreas Schuldei (andreas@schuldei.org) [021007 19:11]: > an other idea (by erikm) was that virutal and physical address > mode is mixed up. how do i find out which one is used by kdb and the > debug interface of the cpu? do i need to convert, somehow? yet another possibility is that a 3Dnow function is used for memset. Would that be caught? i tried compiling the kernel for i386, but it still did not work (to be droped into kdb when the memory gets currupted). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/