Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753451Ab3GHCuK (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jul 2013 22:50:10 -0400 Received: from e23smtp03.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.145]:60506 "EHLO e23smtp03.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753331Ab3GHCuH (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jul 2013 22:50:07 -0400 Message-ID: <51DA28D2.9030104@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:49:54 +0800 From: Michael Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Galbraith CC: Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Alex Shi , Namhyung Kim , Paul Turner , Andrew Morton , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , Ram Pai Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: smart wake-affine References: <51A43B16.9080801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51D25A80.8090406@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130702085202.GA23916@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <51D29EE5.8080307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130704091339.GK18898@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net> <51D5428D.7080805@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1372934013.9046.16.camel@marge.simpson.net> <51D633DB.5010508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1372997318.7315.23.camel@marge.simpson.net> <51D64C84.5080100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1373002865.8318.11.camel@marge.simpson.net> <51D664B9.7010407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1373179405.19316.41.camel@marge.simpson.net> In-Reply-To: <1373179405.19316.41.camel@marge.simpson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13070802-6102-0000-0000-000003D1E50E Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1314 Lines: 37 On 07/07/2013 02:43 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 14:16 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: > >> PeterZ has suggested some optimization which I sent out yesterday, I >> suppose they haven't been included into this test yet, correct? > > No, that was with both v3 patches applied. hackbench -l 1000 delta > tracked to next pull/build fwiw, but I don't see anything noteworthy > elsewhere, so I'm filing it under "tasks/core ~= zillion ~= hohum". I see, thanks for the testing, Mike :) I still can't reproduce the issue on my box, so I suggest we put down this temporarily, if later more similar report show up, let's try to catch the point. BTW, could you please show me the '/proc/cpuinfo' of your box? I'd like to collect some data for analyse later ;-) Regards, Michael Wang > > -Mike > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/