Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 13:47:26 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg Price <price@mit.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf report/top: Add option to collapse undesired
 parts of call graph
Message-ID: <20130708164726.GB3028@ghostprotocols.net>
References: <20130701142841.GE22203@biohazard-cafe.mit.edu>
 <20130707131340.GA23433@krava.brq.redhat.com>
 <20130708115746.GO22203@biohazard-cafe.mit.edu>
 <20130708162452.GB2957@krava.brq.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130708162452.GB2957@krava.brq.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 888
Lines: 21

Em Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 06:24:52PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 07:57:46AM -0400, Greg Price wrote:
> > For example, in an application with an expensive function
> > implemented with deeply nested recursive calls, the default
> > call-graph presentation is dominated by the different callchains
> > within that function.  By ignoring these callees, we can collect the
> > callchains leading into the function and compactly identify what to
> > blame for expensive calls.
 
> change looks ok, but I'm not that confident in this part, so at least:
 
> Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/