Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 23:19:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 23:19:22 -0500 Received: from saturn.cs.uml.edu ([129.63.8.2]:6670 "EHLO saturn.cs.uml.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 23:19:12 -0500 From: "Albert D. Cahalan" Message-Id: <200012310348.eBV3mVA159133@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Subject: Re: PROBLEM: multiple mount of devices possible 2.4.0-test1 - To: viro@math.psu.edu (Alexander Viro) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 22:48:31 -0500 (EST) Cc: linux-kernel@ton.iguana.be (Ton Hospel), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Alexander Viro" at Dec 30, 2000 06:57:43 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro writes: > [...] Not allowing multiple mounts of the same > fs was an artifact of original namei() implementation. At some point > (late 80s) it had been fixed by Bell Labs folks in their branch. In Linux > it had been fixed during the last spring. That's it. You were never promised > that multiple mounts will not work. Moreover, in special cases they did work Heh. :-) 1. go to http://www.linuxcertification.com/resources/quizzes/ 2. take the "System Administration" quiz 3. try answering question 6 correctly - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/