Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 23:30:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 23:30:05 -0500 Received: from clavin.efn.org ([206.163.176.10]:50893 "EHLO clavin.efn.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 23:29:53 -0500 From: Steve VanDevender MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14926.44784.275063.266417@tzadkiel.efn.org> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 19:58:40 -0800 To: "Albert D. Cahalan" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: multiple mount of devices possible 2.4.0-test1 - In-Reply-To: <200012310348.eBV3mVA159133@saturn.cs.uml.edu> In-Reply-To: <200012310348.eBV3mVA159133@saturn.cs.uml.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Albert D. Cahalan writes: > Alexander Viro writes: > > > [...] Not allowing multiple mounts of the same > > fs was an artifact of original namei() implementation. At some point > > (late 80s) it had been fixed by Bell Labs folks in their branch. In Linux > > it had been fixed during the last spring. That's it. You were never promised > > that multiple mounts will not work. Moreover, in special cases they did work > > Heh. :-) > > 1. go to http://www.linuxcertification.com/resources/quizzes/ > 2. take the "System Administration" quiz > 3. try answering question 6 correctly Note: Chances are you won't get the same question 6 that Albert did. Some poorly-written "certification" quiz shouldn't dictate what goes into the kernel, either. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/