Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:43:35 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
        Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>,
        Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PF: Add FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT for guest fault
Message-ID: <20130709154335.GI24941@redhat.com>
References: <1373378207-10451-1-git-send-email-dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1373378207-10451-2-git-send-email-dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20130709152346.GG24941@redhat.com>
 <51DC2E0E.1050309@de.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51DC2E0E.1050309@de.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1276
Lines: 30

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 09/07/13 17:23, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:56:44PM +0200, Dominik Dingel wrote:
> >> In case of a fault retry exit sie64() with gmap_fault indication for the
> >> running thread set. This makes it possible to handle async page faults
> >> without the need for mm notifiers.
> >>
> >> Based on a patch from Martin Schwidefsky.
> >>
> > For that we will obviously need Christian and Cornelia ACKs. Or it can
> > go in via S390 tree.
> > 
> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> 
> Do you want me or Conny to apply these patches add a signoff and resend them?
> Otherwise I will review the s390 specific patches and ack them individually.
> 
If your are OK with me merging this one through kvm.git then just
ack/review all others. I have a small comment on patch 2, but otherwise
the patch series looks OK to me from KVM perspective.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/