Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752283Ab3GISis (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:38:48 -0400 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:17311 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751905Ab3GISio (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:38:44 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,1029,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="35942861" Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 19:38:43 +0100 From: Wei Liu To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= , , , Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 4/4] xen-block: introduce a new request type to unmap grants Message-ID: <20130709183843.GA8754@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <1373288607-1876-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> <1373288607-1876-5-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> <20130708194152.GJ4927@phenom.dumpdata.com> <51DC3C66.2030606@citrix.com> <20130709183207.GA9924@phenom.dumpdata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20130709183207.GA9924@phenom.dumpdata.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3207 Lines: 73 On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 02:32:07PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:37:58PM +0200, Roger Pau Monn? wrote: > > On 08/07/13 21:41, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 03:03:27PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > >> Right now blkfront has no way to unmap grant refs, if using persistent > > >> grants once a grant is used blkfront cannot assure if blkback will > > >> have this grant mapped or not. To solve this problem, a new request > > >> type (BLKIF_OP_UNMAP) that allows requesting blkback to unmap certain > > >> grants is introduced. > > > > > > I don't think this is the right way of doing it. It is a new operation > > > (BLKIF_OP_UNMAP) that has nothing to do with READ/WRITE. All it is > > > is just some way for the frontend to say: unmap this grant if you can. > > > > > > As such I would think a better mechanism would be to have a new > > > grant mechanism that can say: 'I am done with this grant you can > > > remove it' - that is called to the hypervisor. The hypervisor > > > can then figure out whether it is free or not and lazily delete it. > > > (And the guest would be notified when it is freed). > > > > I would prefer not to involve the hypervisor in persistent grants, this > > is something between the frontends and the backends. The hypervisor > > already provides the basic operations (map/unmap), IMHO there's no need > > to add more logic to the hypervisor itself. > > > > I agree that it would be better to have a generic way to request a > > backend to unmap certain grants, but so far this seems like the best > > solution. > > Lets concentrate on a generic way that any frontend/backend can use. > > Please keep in mind that the indirect descriptors could be implemented by > using mapped grants if a backend or frontend wanted to do it. > > This all is tied in the 'feature-persistent-grant' and as that could be > implemented in a similar fashion on netfront (perhaps by only doing it > for one of the rings - the TX ring, or is it RX?). > > > > > > > > > I would presume that this problem would also exist with netback/netfront > > > if it started using persisten grants, right? > > > > I'm not sure of that, it depends on the number of persistent grants > > netfront/netback use, in the block case we need this operation because > > of indirect descriptors, but netfront/netback might not suffer from this > > problem if the maximum number of grants they use is relatively small. > > 256 is the default amount of grants one ring can have. Since there is > a RX and TX ring that means we can have around 512 for one VIF. > > I presume that with the multi-queue (not yet implemented) this can expand > to be 512 * vCPU. > Yes. We need to allow for some space for multiqueue as well as multi page ring. Wei. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/