Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752762Ab3GIWZS (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:25:18 -0400 Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:33127 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751290Ab3GIWZQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:25:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:25:14 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Eliezer Tamir Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Mortons , David Woodhouse , Eliezer Tamir Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: rename low latency sockets functions to busy poll Message-ID: <20130709162514.062f1361@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20130708132034.17639.4396.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com> References: <20130708132034.17639.4396.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 562 Lines: 17 On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:20:34 +0300 Eliezer Tamir wrote: > Rename POLL_LL to POLL_BUSY_LOOP. So pardon me if I speak out of turn, but it occurs to me to wonder...should the SO_LL socket option be renamed in a similar fashion before this interface escapes into the wild? Thanks, jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/