Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 06:05:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 06:05:06 -0500 Received: from p3EE3C9F5.dip.t-dialin.net ([62.227.201.245]:22276 "HELO emma1.emma.line.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 06:04:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 11:34:23 +0100 From: Matthias Andree To: Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.18: /proc/apm slows system time (was: Linux 2.2.19pre3) Message-ID: <20001231113423.A5146@emma1.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Linux kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <20001230133910.A5341@emma1.emma.line.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 17:01:27 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > Looking at the one laptop with this problem I could acquire access to > it seems that the box switches to SMM mode with interrupts disabled > for several timer ticks. During this time the i2c bus is active and it > appears to be having a slow polled conversation with the battery or > something attached to the battery and monitoring it. > > Doing > > while { true } do cat /proc/apm done > > made the box visibly stall and jerk doing X operations Ok, now, what can be done about the stall? I assume nothing serious. Is there at least away we can recover the proper system time after these stalls? -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/