Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:23:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:23:08 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:740 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:23:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:05:34 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@duckman.distro.conectiva To: "J.A. Magallon" Cc: procps-list@redhat.com, Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] procps 2.0.10 In-Reply-To: <20021008145340.GE1560@werewolf.able.es> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 863 Lines: 30 On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, J.A. Magallon wrote: > >should always be 0.0% and it always is 0.0% here. > > > >I have no idea why it's displaying a wrong value on your > >system, unless you somehow managed to run against a wrong > >libproc.so (shouldn't happen). > > It looks like the 2 first screenshots show buggy data: Yup, that's the bug I fixed friday. Wait a moment, I fixed it for five_cpu_numbers(), but probably not for the SMP CPU code in top.c itself ... I'll fix this one after lunch. thanks, Rik -- A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/