Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753271Ab3GKQhN (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:13 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([94.23.35.102]:46591 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751999Ab3GKQhK (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:37:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:37:08 +0200 From: "maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com" To: Hector Palacios Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "fabio.estevam@freescale.com" , Marek Vasut , "cb@sgoc.de" Subject: Re: MXS persistent bits driver Message-ID: <20130711163708.GW11243@lukather> References: <51DE5F1A.8010209@digi.com> <20130711082413.GU11243@lukather> <51DE734A.80206@digi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="A6Z7MKnLVMfR85kG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51DE734A.80206@digi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2555 Lines: 74 --A6Z7MKnLVMfR85kG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Hector, On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:56:42AM +0200, Hector Palacios wrote: > On 07/11/2013 10:24 AM, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com wrote: > >>I haven't seen this is supported upstream. Is anybody working on that? > >>Where would such a driver fit? > > > >Christoph Baumann recently started porting the Freescale's driver to > >newer release. > > > >http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-July/181569.h= tml > > > >This needs quite a lot of work, but it's ongoing. > > > >Also, about where to put such a driver, I started a discussion about > >this last week. Mostly, that would be part of MTD, from what is out of > >the discussion so far. > > > >http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-July/182002.h= tml >=20 > I was talking about RTC persistent bits, not OTP bits, but I they > also fit in your EEPROM like model. I like it! Oops, sorry, I read your mail too quickly. But it's true that it would fit quite well in the EEPROM stuff we're discussing. Feel free to participate, and I'll let you know if something come out of it. Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --A6Z7MKnLVMfR85kG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR3t80AAoJEBx+YmzsjxAg3XsQAIaUjfX2ebrOH4mtIdsZfadq 4BUAJ/vb/YJdO5MBrlUKxxlu/lU7Q/gC3ydJ+jFxzXtpfD94v7yHu4He1ivYra4X 2mJXL00VjskUqrU/4BdzGrX80T14P/0Kw/H+6cwP00zvu0f11yONSGwMkrMPaiHL M86bdojSCv2SwPN2Vo1E2oJ9C6jsSVNjxOGHho2X/s7pd2oPN9LSy+nJc0m9CqY2 hL0KIAqkBo7ExRhNxXefVzJm05NENzl5EHxCTXQ7ZHoZ53GlDrSfarMa0mGifGCk arn2hjwTiNLWs54pVOinSD6QHR1oE2BD9VJSezJ60g7kb+lJmxTdtTQpYefXS+wk oOQImvPaAtT35nltvn+ItRatjt49gXsYCuzyMg8RQgDZ90GsdoaZXqj9LrpwDQWc u4b1cHo72bAyYxbMdYdT3upSMt8wvLEN9NDrmzQVfH8Owubd8/Qv9iIfooKhmRmi WEVU07QmC0QMDnVFpCAmVZHOC4ug6iXS2ulRGO3gbWN3hBkJPUBcyN+AloBtTu2s 2s2HXhhWQ9ZdrrmUdvy1Tr0q/Uy/jc4j08r6aeQyVRKhyxmZVXxGE+XRcWeqD8i+ toaRtFHdI/WeMbZQIYy5gOVDljNpNYPLpWlF+hG9Ott4rYGV2/k/z6nmN0nzGbP8 n5yKt9SgihhJcJ+f6cdC =jAqQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --A6Z7MKnLVMfR85kG-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/