Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:31:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:31:24 -0400 Received: from warden3-p.diginsite.com ([208.147.64.186]:62443 "HELO warden3.diginsite.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:31:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:27:40 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang To: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net cc: simon@baydel.com, , Subject: RE:Re: The end of embedded Linux? In-Reply-To: <03be754301608a2DTVMAIL5@smtp.cwctv.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1164 Lines: 29 correct, also nobody said it would be accepted in the kernel even they GPL it, but the in message I responded to Simon commented that he didn't see how it was possible to make a module that wasn't GPL, and therefor he was looking at having to use a different OS becouse he didn't want to GPL his modules. I was just pointing out that modules that don't use the GPL-only symbols don't have to be GPL (much as we would like them to be) David Lang On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote: > Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:32:25 +0100 > From: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net > To: david.lang@digitalinsight.com, simon@baydel.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: RE:Re: The end of embedded Linux? > > Nobody said if you GPL it they would have to put it in the kernel... > > Cheers, Dean. > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 08:52:49 -0700 (PDT) David Lang wrote: > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/