Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750972Ab3GLEaT (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:30:19 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]:61364 "EHLO mail-we0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750773Ab3GLEaR (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:30:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51DF206E.9010301@gmail.com> References: <1371913383-25088-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> <51D0548D.7020004@gmail.com> <51DF206E.9010301@gmail.com> From: Prabhakar Lad Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:59:54 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3] media: OF: add video sync endpoint property To: Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , LMML , Hans Verkuil , Laurent Pinchart , DLOS , LKML , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Sakari Ailus , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Rob Landley , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1742 Lines: 50 Hi Sylwester, On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 07/11/2013 01:41 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote: > [...] > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c >>>> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c >>>> index aa59639..1a54530 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c >>>> @@ -100,6 +100,26 @@ static void v4l2_of_parse_parallel_bus(const struct >>>> device_node *node, >>>> if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "data-shift",&v)) >>>> bus->data_shift = v; >>>> >>>> + if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "video-sync",&v)) { >>>> + switch (v) { >>>> + case V4L2_MBUS_VIDEO_SEPARATE_SYNC: >>>> + flags |= V4L2_MBUS_VIDEO_SEPARATE_SYNC; >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm not convinced all those video sync types is something that really >>> belongs >>> to the flags field. In my understanding this field is supposed to hold >>> only >>> the _signal polarity_ information. >>> >>> >> Ok, so there should be a function say v4l2_of_parse_signal_polarity() >> to get the polarity alone then. > > > I don't think this is required, I would just extend > v4l2_of_parse_parallel_bus() > function to also handle sync-on-green-active property. > If that is the case than I have to add a member say 'signal_polarity' in struct v4l2_of_bus_parallel and assign the polarity to it. Let me know if you are OK with it. Regards, --Prabhakar Lad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/