Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757553Ab3GLJhr (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 05:37:47 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([94.23.35.102]:49199 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757528Ab3GLJhY (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 05:37:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:37:20 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Emilio Lopez , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Mark Rutland , nicolas.pitre@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: sunxi: Convert DTSI to new CPU bindings Message-ID: <20130712093720.GE24370@lukather> References: <1372437844-16325-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20130628171532.GD30603@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20130628200333.GA2756@lukather> <20130629193819.GD3353@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130630094846.GA27559@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20130705101946.GA5584@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h56sxpGKRmy85csR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130705101946.GA5584@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4969 Lines: 123 --h56sxpGKRmy85csR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Lorenzo, On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:19:46AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:48:46AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:38:19PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrot= e: > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Maxime Ripard > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > > >> The patch above should already be queued in next/dt right ? > > > > > > > > > > Indeed. > > > > > > > > > > Then why the latest patch of your patchset got in 3.10, while the > > > > > patches actually fixing the DT it would have impacted were delaye= d to > > > > > 3.11? > > > > > > > > > > (And why was it merged so late in the development cycle?) > > > >=20 > > > > This. So now we have to scramble because some device trees will > > > > produce warnings at boot. > > > >=20 > > > > Russell, the alternative is to revert Lorenzo's patch for 3.10 (and > > > > re-introduce it for 3.11). Do you have a preference? > > >=20 > > > Sorry but I really don't understand what all the fuss in this thread > > > is about. > > >=20 > > > This thread seems to be saying that two development patches were > > > merged, which were 7762/1 and 7763/1, and that 7764/1 is a fix? > > > Are you sure about that, because that's not how they're described, > > > and not how they look either. > >=20 > > As Olof's warning downgrade is being merged (thanks for that and apolog= ies for > > failing to explain patches dependencies properly and stable related iss= ues), > > 7764/1 won't apply cleanly anymore. Can you please drop it from the pat= ch > > system, I will update it and test it first thing tomorrow and send a > > final version to the patch system. >=20 > Patch 7779/1, replacing 7764/1 is in the patch system now, and is ready > to get merged. >=20 > Unfortunately cpu/cpus bindings documentation updates, following: >=20 > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-June/036735.ht= ml > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-May/033779.html >=20 > were not pulled in the kernel. This is an issue since this means that > we still have no reference in the kernel or wherever it has to be, to > the final cpus/cpu bindings for ARM and ARM64 provided in the pull > request link above (that has been reviewed to death and acknowledged). >=20 > It is a significant overhaul of cpu/cpus bindings standard for ARM/ARM64, > covering all CPUs harking back to arm926 and beyond, and should be final. >=20 > dts updates following that standard have already been pulled into 3.11 > through arm-soc. >=20 > IMHO the bindings contained in pull request above must be merged in the > kernel asap, I would like to ask you please what should I do to get them = in > please. If we want to move bindings documentation elsewhere let's do it, > as long as there is a published standard I am happy and will stop annoying > you with this stuff. Just to be clear, I had no problems with the patches themselves, but just the way it was merged. That being said, I think every DTS patch you did should be merged by now, only the second patch of this serie for the A10S hasn't. Arnd, Olof, could you just apply the patch 2 for a 3.11-rc*? It's the only rc patch for the sunxi platform for now, so I don't think a pull request would be worth it, but I can send one anyway if you prefer. Thanks! Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --h56sxpGKRmy85csR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR385QAAoJEBx+YmzsjxAgPS8QAJ8lcj08QZBDAORWa64vAMK1 WlM1vDA7JOH2mrbs39pRf0sMjRbOmuI1Dc06u46Wm4hcXJSStoVBtKd6N2+px1gA bUiic30BY8KLS8RmN+WB8zwJ9xt0dBurm3M5c7NGNE1Fmac5iUWdDdaNu8mUJr8X +/orKY80FqoPw47W+S8/sekx87nQbhEDvXp4Wg2MzgpkUf9OmrHj1fsorzfzOe62 wReyjgXmawt4omAxMBhdZUgE6DfEHQ8oNp16ckN+LbX3veTSFI5XzunbS/5fRJjB BtiW9G8Dwco2YHGBAOAdTwaTY6DY9Otq3JniTo0tHCfKM9oMo8/oVOTKQtm+CWCr sK1VxYBTT/jUnhFB2sZcbuUm48VIigxMrjleSmmQXxi1FuywqFaqJhu/T+8CB4Zy GWszkHOQZ4Aw8JyjYRQt79hSND19JkUVnnEDfHkCtWQJzeTHfp0eB6f0t7akI1BV oMMUvCmwsw+Oox2xlqK+VfwbI0FYEk8ck0vQwxvRQONM8p5LHI0eD/ebS9ijc8UU VAhHQYswrgyMVBoLT9oKoUihdbbiU9KRycStWr7c+JH+Z9IOjvecVT7JHUf3Sicw 5IpxQAJvPFtNpYppa/xnJzGAHcGC1X+o+SFAMOWm8zKdKvUzHdRllRroZ/LWaJtK MPkbgMxeuufWdJ+LFkff =nOPy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h56sxpGKRmy85csR-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/