Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932645Ab3GLJrF (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 05:47:05 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53314 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757350Ab3GLJrC (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 05:47:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:46:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Steven Rostedt Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] When to push bug fixes to mainline In-Reply-To: <1373594058.17876.71.camel@gandalf.local.home> Message-ID: References: <20130711214830.611455274@linuxfoundation.org> <20130712005023.GB31005@thunk.org> <1373594058.17876.71.camel@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 810 Lines: 23 On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Maybe the pendulum has swung too far in the direction of holding back > > changes and trying to avoid the risk of introducing regressions; > > perhaps this would be a good topic to discuss at the Kernel Summit. > > Bah, I sent out a similar email about discussing this at KS too. Before > seeing this one. If this is going to be picked up as a discussion topic at KS, I believe it can be easily merged with my "stable: too pushy maintainers" proposal I sent a couple days ago. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/