Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932852Ab3GLLT0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:19:26 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]:33518 "EHLO mail-ob0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932637Ab3GLLTY (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:19:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20130711214830.611455274@linuxfoundation.org> <20130712005023.GB31005@thunk.org> <1373594058.17876.71.camel@gandalf.local.home> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:19:22 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] When to push bug fixes to mainline From: Josh Boyer To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Steven Rostedt , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 878 Lines: 22 On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> > Maybe the pendulum has swung too far in the direction of holding back >> > changes and trying to avoid the risk of introducing regressions; >> > perhaps this would be a good topic to discuss at the Kernel Summit. >> >> Bah, I sent out a similar email about discussing this at KS too. Before >> seeing this one. > > If this is going to be picked up as a discussion topic at KS, I believe it > can be easily merged with my "stable: too pushy maintainers" proposal I > sent a couple days ago. Yes, I agree. josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/