Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:23:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:22:20 -0400 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:16776 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:22:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:27:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: James Bottomley cc: Adrian Bunk , Alan Cox , Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.41-ac1 In-Reply-To: <200210081900.g98J0CL09162@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1020 Lines: 27 On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, James Bottomley wrote: > kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de said: > > And you do not really want to do this, you rather want CONFIG_VOYAGER > > to define_bool CONFIG_X86_SMP y and be done without ugly hacks in the > > Makefiles. > > I'm afraid voyager can't do that. CONFIG_SMP was split from CONFIG_X86_SMP > for precisely this reason. CONFIG_X86_SMP is for generic intel SMP > architectures (i.e. APIC based). The voyager has it's own rather wierd VIC > based SMP architecture. > > However, how about the attached patch, which fixes the problem for me (I can > only compile, not test, because my voyager system is at home and I'm away on > business) The patch does exactly what I would have suggested next, so I am very happy with it ;) --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/