Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755109Ab3GOKVx (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:21:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:33135 "EHLO mail-ob0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754976Ab3GOKVw (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:21:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51E3C950.90503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20130711221419.547.69781.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <20130711221704.547.64296.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> <51E3C950.90503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:51:51 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] cpufreq: Preserve policy structure across suspend/resume From: Viresh Kumar To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, toralf.foerster@gmx.de, robert.jarzmik@intel.com, durgadoss.r@intel.com, tianyu.lan@intel.com, lantianyu1986@gmail.com, dirk.brandewie@gmail.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 592 Lines: 12 On 15 July 2013 15:35, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > Actually even I was wondering about this while writing the patch and > I even tested shutdown after multiple suspend/resume cycles, to verify that > the refcount is messed up. But surprisingly, things worked just fine. What kind of system have you tested it on? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/