Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:31:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:31:05 -0500 Received: from tomts8.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.52]:48056 "EHLO tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:30:55 -0500 From: Ed Tomlinson Subject: Re: test13-pre7... To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:00:07 -0500 Lines: 24 Organization: me Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: KNode/0.3.3 Message-Id: <20001231150008.97F705E18A@oscar.casa.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chris Evans wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Steven Cole wrote: > > > > > > It looks like 2.4.0-test13-pre7 is a clear winner when running dbench > > > 48 on my somewhat slow test machine (450 Mhz P-III, 192MB, IDE). > > > > This is almost certainly purely due to changing (some would say > > "fixing") the bdflush synchronous wait point. > > Nice:) > > Did Rik's drop_behind performance fix make it in or can we look forward to > another jump in the dbench benchmarks? And please do not forget marcello's swap clustering patch. I get a 13% improvement on dbench with reiserfs when patched with it. From conversations on kernelnewbies, Riel likes this one too. Ed Tomlinson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/