Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:39:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:39:45 -0400 Received: from fmr01.intel.com ([192.55.52.18]:3014 "EHLO hermes.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:39:44 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Grover, Andrew" To: "'Iain McClatchie'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: SMP ACPI S3 support in 2.4 series? Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:45:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1179 Lines: 30 > From: Iain McClatchie [mailto:iain@truecircuits.com] > I'm buying a number of SMP servers. These machines will go > idle for days at a time, and we'd like to send them into a > suspend-to-RAM (ACPI state S3) while they are unused. > > I want to know if this is even possible with the Linux 2.4 > series kernels, and if so, which hardware and kernel combinations > support it. I'd also like to know if anyone really has this > working right now. > > As dual Athlon systems appear to be the best performance/$ for > my application, I'm especially interested in getting those to > sleep, but I'll take any pointers I can get. S3 is really more "off" than servers generally want to be. Servers typically don't even support it. I would think for a server, you would want to leave it on, and maybe turn off the disks, or something. Or maybe just turn the systems off. 2.4 doesn't (and won't) support S3, anyways. Regards -- Andy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/