Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751199Ab3GPEKN (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:10:13 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:39768 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750835Ab3GPEKL (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:10:11 -0400 Message-ID: <1373947801.31067.157.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] KS Topic request: Handling the Stable kernel, let's dump the cc: stable tag From: Ben Hutchings To: Dave Airlie Cc: Steven Rostedt , Greg KH , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:10:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1373916476.2748.69.camel@dabdike> <20130715214422.GA2478@kroah.com> <1373925699.17876.218.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130716000623.GB26261@kroah.com> <1373940594.17876.241.camel@gandalf.local.home> <1373942486.31067.122.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Hz7Yp6NbV3Znxpf9Uk66" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.101 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3500 Lines: 90 --=-Hz7Yp6NbV3Znxpf9Uk66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 13:27 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Ben Hutchings wro= te: > > On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 22:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > [...] > >> > > How important is the stable releases? Are maintainers willing to d= o a > >> > > little more work now to make sure their subsystems work fine in ol= der > >> > > kernels? This isn't the same stable as it was 8 years ago. > >> > > >> > And that annoys the hell out of some Linux companies who feel that t= he > >> > stable kernels compete with them. So people working for those compa= nies > >> > might not get as much help with doing any additional work for stable > >> > kernel releases (this is not just idle gossip, I've heard it directl= y > >> > from management's mouths.) > >> > >> Hmm, this is new to me. Really, I thought the whole point of the stabl= e > >> releases was to help Linux companies. > > [...] > > > > I also heard some managers decided their kernel source packages should > > have all the patches squashed together to make them harder to cherry- > > pick... could it have been the same company? >=20 > Greg loves to tell stories about RH management, but really if he can > find any engineer who works for RH that says he can't work on stable > due to being told by management, I'd be surprised. To be clear, I very much appreciate the level of contribution to stable from RH developers. And it's a little too high to believe these are just a few rogues flouting policy. :-) > Maybe when stable > first surfaced there was a hope of it being close to RHEL, The lack of non-trivial driver backports means it's not really competitive with any commercial distribution. (But it looks a little better if you add in compat-drivers.) > but at this > point stable has little to no usefulness from a RHEL point of view, > and since nearly all the RH employed maintainers all do stable work, I > can't see why Greg would think this matters. >=20 > In fact Greg how much of stable queue does come from Red Hatters? Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Humans are not rational beings; they are rationalising beings. --=-Hz7Yp6NbV3Znxpf9Uk66 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAUeTHmee/yOyVhhEJAQrx8g//R3mDB74oiS8W3Ej5G1oCNaZo+T8im+HT XViDXG1N/69KnZG//Ku5fuKDizdyvdHY1eQ7/wRn7aFYQl5Gu8/A/41/i9A+kPtI LhAr4Bq/08q1zcOKHJw0Lw206Waf+utrXY5MsIrc8A4Ul4E6FZ+QvcWtypH3ZhLr PRoKqLV8vpJewVUWx/fV2wXDjBPKjeRSJEuFm+QKKnxCFOiGlzB0iJDriN6pO7zj MnBBj1RNBM+aDozS7xRGzxVEo9MPbzQcT2S8YuzfuxxIB3vXcM73QXe05UyCH+Fb oPBfjmqTBo7jl4oxESK0H8lrSbW0Mj36qRGqJ27sJSH16sgchzmAV+0UgYVSLbq3 YbvNiDpfnKk3TK6+b9Gl7jsnWFReFO5st7Xn/9qK8qskaeL3MzFOeTHc4MjTtoNV Ito6X1Us7k+nLBm2R7p83OE1S5YPGY38uL0fuC7KOdu6HOubx9qCK5/Iyo3G+2eX Ag0eIiYzNn510qKjlxhRsTQF4Bv/MzTHQ9+XLMyvygwisdNXHqmfFHaz6D1m3yk0 e1i6QdrDvM8ZMajpDKPIxiFOkkf0j5k4K2Asqgs5TWKzh/MrvuMIRM/X7FQTTXZm C/c/NNFhSDYycMPVI2W3uJTF/q5gGck4wfdjdAvJOtvcq3fpOOsh9dZSWm7XdYbs O9dRBgglUuc= =YlBT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Hz7Yp6NbV3Znxpf9Uk66-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/