Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753040Ab3GPHrW (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 03:47:22 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:54798 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752436Ab3GPHrU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 03:47:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:47:27 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Kyungsik Lee , Michal Marek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, celinux-dev@lists.celinuxforum.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, hyojun.im@lge.com, chan.jeong@lge.com, raphael.andy.lee@gmail.com, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Russell King , Borislav Petkov , Florian Fainelli , Yann Collet , Chanho Min Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] kbuild: fix for updated LZ4 tool with the new streaming format Message-Id: <20130716004727.b60b2c96.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <51E472D4.5060307@zytor.com> References: <1367829775-4434-1-git-send-email-kyungsik.lee@lge.com> <1367829775-4434-2-git-send-email-kyungsik.lee@lge.com> <20130712075602.GA4002@gmail.com> <20130715150342.35f7620ffe0835e3e2bc37d0@linux-foundation.org> <51E472D4.5060307@zytor.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1133 Lines: 31 On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:08:20 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > On 07/15/2013 03:03 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > I don't know how to do this. Any suggestions? > > > > It has to be done at `make config' time. We'd need to probe for the > > presence of lz4c and then.... what? > > > > Is there any precedent for this? > > > > I don't think we can just ignore the absence of lz4c - the user has > > selected a config which his system cannot build. The problem lies > > within randconfig itself. > > > > We keep running over the need to be able to have kconfig run tests on > the build system (for toolchain support or for optional tools needed); > running them in the Makefiles (i.e. at Kbuild time) is simply too late. > Would it make sense to extend Kconfig's `depends'? depends on $(shell-command) I don't know how practical that would be to implement... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/