Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261667AbSJHWWy>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:22:54 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261606AbSJHWVS>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:21:18 -0400
Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:58104 "EHLO
	passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261571AbSJHWVJ>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:21:09 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 13/07/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
X-Accept-Language: en_GB
In-Reply-To: <20021008222444.GB12379@suse.de> 
References: <20021008222444.GB12379@suse.de>  <20021008.150444.118305428.davem@redhat.com> <200210060846.g968klWf000632@pool-141-150-241-241.delv.east.verizon.net> <3D9FFD21.8040404@pobox.com> <8973.1034111628@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> <18079.1034115320@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> 
To: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>, skip.ford@verizon.net,
       jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New BK License Problem? 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 23:26:41 +0100
Message-ID: <20143.1034116001@passion.cambridge.redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 604
Lines: 18


davej@codemonkey.org.uk said:
>  How about 'stable' and 'devel', then we won't have to worry about
> renaming/resubscribing when we switch revisions. 

Would you suggest sending 2.4 and 2.6 changesets to the same 'stable' list 
or making a new one for each release? I'd suggest the latter option, 
hence making the naming explicit from the start.

--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/