Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:27:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:26:14 -0400 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:33291 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:26:00 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: vpath broken in 2.5.41 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 08 Oct 2002 09:35:56 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:31:29 +1000 Message-ID: <2593.1034116289@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 989 Lines: 21 On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:35:56 -0500 (CDT), Kai Germaschewski wrote: >On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Keith Owens wrote: >> This is one of the problems that kbuild 2.5 was designed to handle, to >> cope with modules built from code in multiple directories. I support >> what the developer wants to do, not restrict the developer to what the >> kernel build can handle. > >So would you mind telling me what arch/i386/drivers/Makefile.in would >look like for a module which is built from sources in arch/i386/drivers >and drivers/oprofile ? Do you really expect me to help you sort out the mess you have made of kernel build? So you can pick more ideas and bug fixes from kbuild 2.5 and claim the credit for them? Forget it! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/