Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261675AbSJHW0I>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:26:08 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261644AbSJHWZe>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:25:34 -0400
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:20749 "EHLO
	www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S261675AbSJHWZ2>;
	Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:25:28 -0400
Message-ID: <3DA35CAB.20101@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 18:31:07 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
CC: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, dwmw2@infradead.org, skip.ford@verizon.net,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New BK License Problem?
References: <8973.1034111628@passion.cambridge.redhat.com>	<18079.1034115320@passion.cambridge.redhat.com>	<20021008222444.GB12379@suse.de> <20021008.152056.122223929.davem@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 539
Lines: 20

David S. Miller wrote:
>     > How about
>     >  bk-commits-head
>     >  bk-commits-2.4
>     > 
>     > then later bk-commits-2.6 etc...

> I expect people to maintain 2.4.x even when 2.6.x is
> "stable" even once 2.7.x has begun.
> 
> Therefore, I like your first idea the best.


likewise

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/