Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964839Ab3GPVMi (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:12:38 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:42780 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964786Ab3GPVMg (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:12:36 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,679,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="346643842" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:12:35 -0700 From: Sarah Sharp To: Olivier Galibert Cc: David Lang , Steven Rostedt , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Guenter Roeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , stable , Darren Hart , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: [ATTEND] How to act on LKML (was: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review) Message-ID: <20130716211235.GG4994@xanatos> References: <20130715184642.GE15531@xanatos> <20130715195316.GF15531@xanatos> <20130715204135.GH15531@xanatos> <1373926109.17876.221.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130715223615.GI15531@xanatos> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2123 Lines: 43 On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:14:51AM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:32 AM, David Lang wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > > >> The people who want to work together in a civil manner should get > >> together and create a "Kernel maintainer's code of conduct" that > >> outlines what they expect from fellow kernel developers. The people who > >> want to continue acting "unprofessionally" should document what > >> behaviors set off their cursing streaks, so that others can avoid that > >> behavior. Somewhere in the middle is the community behavior all > >> developers can thrive in. > > > > > > By defining your viewpoint as being "professional" and the other viewpoint > > as being "unprofessional" you have already started using very loaded terms > > and greatly reduces the probability of actually getting the other group to > > agree and participate. > > Especially since you can very easily translate these terms into > "American" and "non-American". > > The stereotypical american professionalism attitude is to be polite at > the word choice level the best to hide a profund disrespect under > them. There's no meaning taken into account, it's just keyword > spotting. "Your code is crap" is considered unprofessional, while > "Let's leverage my fifth grade nephew's capabilities to assist you in > fixing the code" is perfectly professional, somehow. That's more > often than not an unacceptable attitude in europe. I *hate* both direct personal insults and indirect personal insults. Neither should be acceptable in our community. As I stated in an email to Rusty, what I'm objecting to here is not kernel developers criticizing code. I'm objecting to personal attacks, and developers directing personal verbal abuse towards each other. This include all developers, not just Linus. Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/