Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934102Ab3GPVjE (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:39:04 -0400 Received: from static.92.5.9.176.clients.your-server.de ([176.9.5.92]:43279 "EHLO hallynmail2" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933356Ab3GPVjC (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:39:02 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:39:00 +0000 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Al Viro , Serge Hallyn , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] allow some kernel filesystems to be mounted in a user namespace Message-ID: <20130716213900.GB24076@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20130716192920.GA8980@sergelap> <20130716193826.GP4165@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130716195002.GA23370@mail.hallyn.com> <51E5BC0D.3090303@mit.edu> <20130716213748.GA24076@mail.hallyn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130716213748.GA24076@mail.hallyn.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1592 Lines: 34 Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serge@hallyn.com): > Quoting Andy Lutomirski (luto@amacapital.net): > > On 07/16/2013 12:50 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Quoting Al Viro (viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk): > > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 02:29:20PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > >>> All the files will be owned by host root, so there's no security > > >>> concern in allowing this. > > >> > > >> Files owned by root != very bad things can't be done by non-root. > > >> Especially for debugfs, which is very much a "don't even think about > > >> mounting that on a production box" thing... > > > > > > I would prefer it not be mounted. But near as I can tell there > > > should be no regression security-wise whether an unprivileged > > > user on the host has access to it, or whether a user in a > > > non-init user ns is allowed to mount it. (Obviously I could very > > > well be wrong) > > > > I would argue that either (a) debugfs denies everything to non-root, so > > mounting it in a (rootless) userns is useless or (b) it doesn't, in > > which case it's dangerous. > > > > In neither case does it make sense to me to allow the mount. > > It makes sense from the POV of having sane user-space. I can obviously > work around this by tweaking a stock container rootfs to be different > from a stock host rootfs. It is undesirable. (s/It/But that/) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/