Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:48:10 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
        Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, aswin@hp.com, scott.norton@hp.com,
        chegu_vinod@hp.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: Limit idle_balance() when it is being used too
 frequently
Message-ID: <20130717074810.GZ17211@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1374002463.3944.11.camel@j-VirtualBox>
 <20130716202015.GX17211@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <1374014881.2332.21.camel@j-VirtualBox>
 <20130717072504.GY17211@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130717072504.GY17211@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 519
Lines: 11

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:25:04AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> One thing that I thought of since is that we need to consider what
> happens for people with a low resolution sched_clock. IIRC there are
> still platforms that are jiffy based.

Ignore that, they're all UP.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/