Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754615Ab3GQMVY (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:21:24 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:24921 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753796Ab3GQMVW (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:21:22 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Du3UCRD+ c=1 sm=0 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:17 a=Drc5e87SC40A:10 a=QIZFyTDxVIcA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=WKn5AdJQQDgA:10 a=EHylY17xyOf5UOlcSUMA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 67.255.60.225 Message-ID: <1374063678.6458.124.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] How to act on LKML From: Steven Rostedt To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Jeff Liu , Sarah Sharp , David Lang , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Darren Hart , Olivier Galibert , stable , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:21:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130717055139.GC21611@1wt.eu> References: <20130715223615.GI15531@xanatos> <20130716211235.GG4994@xanatos> <20130716212704.GB9371@thunk.org> <20130716224357.GK4994@xanatos> <1374015299.6458.76.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130716231217.GL4994@xanatos> <51E5E609.1030202@oracle.com> <1374022296.6458.118.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130717055139.GC21611@1wt.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 857 Lines: 21 On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 07:51 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > I don't believe this is that much practiced on LKML. I know at least > one developer who does this, but he's probably the exception. I more > often see counter proposals just as if two authors were fighting to > get their patch merged. And getting cursed out on LKML is also the exception and not the rule. But it's the bad apples that seem to stand out. People say how horrible LKML is, but as mentioned in the thread, Slashdot is a much worse place to post than LKML. The difference with LKML is that you may deserve the cursing you get. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/