Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 03:32:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 03:32:12 -0400 Received: from [195.20.32.236] ([195.20.32.236]:9112 "HELO euro.verza.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 03:32:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:37:25 +0200 From: Alexander Kellett To: jw schultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The end of embedded Linux? Message-ID: <20021009073725.GA22778@groucho.verza.com> Mail-Followup-To: jw schultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3DA1CF36.19659.13D4209@localhost> <3DA2BD70.14919.2C6951@localhost> <20021008112719.GC6537@pegasys.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021008112719.GC6537@pegasys.ws> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 824 Lines: 22 On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:27:19AM -0700, jw schultz wrote: > You might look into something like using the adeos > nano-kernel to host linux and the device controll > software as seperate contexts with a communications > interface between them. This talk of adeos reminds me of something that i'd "dreamed" of a while back. Whats the feasability of having a 70kb kernel that barely even provides support for user space apps and is basically just an hardware abstraction layer for "applications" that can be written as kernel modules? mvg, Alex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/