Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758341Ab3GRGYn (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 02:24:43 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55793 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751629Ab3GRGYl (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 02:24:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 23:24:47 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Cc: grant.likely@linaro.org, tony@atomide.com, balbi@ti.com, arnd@arndb.de, swarren@nvidia.com, sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, rob@landley.net, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, benoit.cousson@linaro.org, mchehab@redhat.com, cesarb@cesarb.net, davem@davemloft.net, rnayak@ti.com, shawn.guo@linaro.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com, balajitk@ti.com, george.cherian@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/8] drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework Message-ID: <20130718062447.GA19997@kroah.com> References: <1372247257-30186-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <1372247257-30186-2-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <20130717062944.GA24968@kroah.com> <51E664CB.8050906@ti.com> <20130717172510.GB17093@kroah.com> <51E78525.9000802@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51E78525.9000802@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1705 Lines: 39 On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:33:17AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >> Wanted to group all the PHY drivers to be used by different subsystems > >> (SATA/USB/PCIE/HDMI/VIDEO) into a single entity. There were some comments in my > >> initial version [3] on using a bus_type instead of class but then it was > >> decided to go with class itself. > >> > >> [3] -> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1302.2/01389.html > > > > Ok, but what does the class usage get you? > > hmm.. actually I use class only to iterate through the list of devices in *phy* > class which could very well be implemented using list. Just that I wont have a > /sys/class/phy/ entry to find the list of phys added in the system. I dont > think I want to add any other stuff to expose to the user space at this point > of time. > > > >>> When modifying/adding new sysfs stuff, you need a Documentation/ABI/ > >>> entry as well. > >> > >> I'm not actually adding any new sysfs entry other than what a *class_create* > >> must have created. Do I need to add one for that? > > > > If you are not creating anything in sysfs at all, why use the driver > > model? (hint, I think you need to do something here to justify it...) > > Well.. it helps me to use pm_runtime to enable clocks utilizing the > parent-child relationship. Ok, that's a good reason for this, nevermind then. Care to send the latest patches you have in emails so I can review them? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/