Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:23:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:23:08 -0400 Received: from server0027.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.36]:32183 "EHLO server0027.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:23:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:42:07 +0100 From: Ian Molton To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The end of embedded Linux? Message-Id: <20021009134207.6eddf981.spyro@f2s.com> In-Reply-To: <20021009073725.GA22778@groucho.verza.com> References: <3DA1CF36.19659.13D4209@localhost> <3DA2BD70.14919.2C6951@localhost> <20021008112719.GC6537@pegasys.ws> <20021009073725.GA22778@groucho.verza.com> Organization: The Dragon Roost X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.3cvs4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 664 Lines: 16 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:37:25 +0200 Alexander Kellett wrote: > This talk of adeos reminds me of something that i'd > "dreamed" of a while back. Whats the feasability of > having a 70kb kernel that barely even provides support > for user space apps and is basically just an hardware > abstraction layer for "applications" that can be > written as kernel modules? Isnt that a microkernel? ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/