Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:32:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:31:55 -0400 Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com ([204.127.202.62]:61122 "EHLO sccrmhc02.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:31:08 -0400 Message-ID: <3DA42315.9020308@quark.didntduck.org> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:37:41 -0400 From: Brian Gerst User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020607 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lell02 CC: Jens Axboe , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Status of UDF CD packet writing? References: <200210091042.g99Agwjm009964@tom.rz.uni-passau.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1749 Lines: 47 lell02 wrote: >>On Tue, Oct 08 2002, lell02 wrote: >> >>>hi, >>> >>> >>>>Will Jens Axboes patch for CD packet writing for CD-R/RW make it in >>>>before the feature freeze? I know Jens Axboe is busy with more basic I/O >>>>stuff, but i sincerely hope it can be squeezed in before 2.6/3.0 is >>>>released. >>> >>>jens stated on this about 1-2 days ago. he said, it would be little >>>modification on the ide-cdrom, to make it work with cd-mrw/ packet >>>writing. so it could go in after the feature freeze. >> >>You might be talking about two different patches -- one for cd-rw >>support (this is the pktcdvd (or -packet) patch that Peter Osterlund has >>been maintaining) and the other for cd-mrw. The cd-mrw patch is very >>small, not a lot is required to support that in the cd driver. >>Supporting cd-rw is a lot harder, basically you have to do in software >>what cd-mrw does in hardware (defect management, read-modify-write >>packet gathering, etc). >> >>cd-mrw will definitely be in 2.6. cd-rw support maybe, I haven't even >>looked at that lately. >> > > > thanx for clearing out these differences. > > but, isn't cd-mrw supposed to replace the old packet-writing technique? > so, in the end, there wouldn't be any need for packet-writing, if every burner > ships with cd-mrw-support... i read in the "specs", that the technology would > be much better. For drives that support cd-mrw. Older cd-rw drives will still need the full blown packet writing patch though. -- Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/