Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758780Ab3GRK4l (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 06:56:41 -0400 Received: from mail9.hitachi.co.jp ([133.145.228.44]:38269 "EHLO mail9.hitachi.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757780Ab3GRK4j (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 06:56:39 -0400 Message-ID: <51E7C9E3.1070506@hitachi.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:56:35 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu Organization: Hitachi, Ltd., Japan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Steven Rostedt , "zhangwei(Jovi)" , Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Srikar Dronamraju , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] tracing: Kill tracing_open/release_generic_file References: <20130716185726.GA21200@redhat.com> <1374004295.6458.59.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130717191917.GA14137@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130717191917.GA14137@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1433 Lines: 40 (2013/07/18 4:19), Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 07/16, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 20:57 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >>> trace_array_get() goes away. NOTE! this is actually wrong until we >>> change instance_delete() path to nullify ->i_private. >> >> I think this needs to be done first. > > Do you mean "change instance_delete() path to nullify ->i_private" ? > > Yes. Well yes and no, afaics, but please ignore. Of course, I won't > send the patches with the holes which I knew about. > > Once again, this is just RFC to know your and Masami's opinion. If > you think this can work, I'll try to resend this series with the > additional bits to cover instance_delete() too. _Afaics_ this needs > some temporary uglifications "in between". I think your proposal goes a good direction, but it also requires completeness, because, as I pointed, we have to take care of all operations are correctly checked except for open/close. So, I agree with Steven, I'd like to see a complete patchset. Thank you, -- Masami HIRAMATSU IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/